20.8% of Gen Z identify as LGBTQ+

[RyCamp88]

Some interesting rudimentary stats from this thread about the comments received, just to provide some context and insight as a whole:

Supportive comments 103

• mintyrox 27
  
• ladsnet 22
  
• jdcyl 18
  
• cochineal 15
  
• ollie2uk 9
  
• heinrich 3
  
• edu29d 2
  
• jwb52z 2
  
• jasper 2
  
• pranava 2
  
• evilscot 1
  

Contrary comments 92

• rycamp 48
  
• jumbler 18
  
• parsifal 16
  
• john 6
  
• pinkpunk 2
  
• bangle1 2
  

I don't know what you mean by "Contrary" (apparently your personal interpretation), but I dispute that I made any comments at all that are not supportive of transexuals.
Obviously I disagree with your personal interpretation of Supportive/Contrary.

How much time did you waste re-reading 195 posts?

Whatever your interpretation, 103/92 is almost even. What does that say?

I consider your so-called "study" to be invalid.

Yeah i really would love to know what he or maybe they, were hoping to achieve with that post.

[MintyRox]

Update: 

Supportive comments 105

• mintyrox 29
  
• ladsnet 22
  
• jdcyl 18
  
• cochineal 15
  
• ollie2uk 9
  
• heinrich 3
  
• edu29d 2
  
• jwb52z 2
  
• jasper 2
  
• pranava 2
  
• evilscot 1
  

Contrary comments 96

• rycamp 51
  
• jumbler 18
  
• parsifal 17
  
• john 6
  
• pinkpunk 2
  
• bangle1 2
  

[ladsnet]

We may be approaching the end of this now.
It doesn't appear to be going anywhere.

[Parsifal]

On further thought MintyRox's so-called "study" might garner some validity if he will just change the category labels to:
Supportive of MintyRox's Comments
Contrary to MintyRox's Comments

That would work.  In that case I'm glad to be in the bottom category because I have found MintyRox's posts to be based in ignorance (= to ignore the truth).  They're well-intentioned for sure, but ...

He mistook Garbage-in-Garbage-out for Garbage-in-Gospel-out.
The result is garbage.

To be sure, I have never posted any comments that are not supportive of transexuals.

Oh, I see that I'm up 1 to 17. Probably because I called his so-called "study" out for what it is. I suppose that counts as Contrary to being Supportive of MintyRox's world view.

[Bangle1]

Some interesting rudimentary stats from this thread about the comments received, just to provide some context and insight as a whole:

Supportive comments 103

• mintyrox 27
  
• ladsnet 22
  
• jdcyl 18
  
• cochineal 15
  
• ollie2uk 9
  
• heinrich 3
  
• edu29d 2
  
• jwb52z 2
  
• jasper 2
  
• pranava 2
  
• evilscot 1
  

Contrary comments 92

• rycamp 48
  
• jumbler 18
  
• parsifal 16
  
• john 6
  
• pinkpunk 2
  
• bangle1 2
  

What context/insight are you making? What is your point of measurement that determines I am not supportive? I clearly stated that trans people should be treated with dignity and respect, while balancing the rights of cisgendered women. In my other comment I pointed out that it isn't for a bunch of blokes on here to be dictating/deciding/mansplaining women's rights.

I guess anyone who doesn't agree with you implicitly, or was mistaken in to believing it was a discussion, is 'contrary'.

[Parsifal]

What context/insight are you making? What is your point of measurement that determines I am not supportive? I clearly stated that trans people should be treated with dignity and respect, while balancing the rights of cisgendered women. In my other comment I pointed out that it isn't for a bunch of blokes on here to be dictating/deciding/mansplaining women's rights.

I guess anyone who doesn't agree with you implicitly, or was mistaken in to believing it was a discussion, is 'contrary'.

You'll probably be up to 3 Contrary comments now after that post.

[RyCamp88]

Some interesting rudimentary stats from this thread about the comments received, just to provide some context and insight as a whole:

Supportive comments 103

• mintyrox 27
  
• ladsnet 22
  
• jdcyl 18
  
• cochineal 15
  
• ollie2uk 9
  
• heinrich 3
  
• edu29d 2
  
• jwb52z 2
  
• jasper 2
  
• pranava 2
  
• evilscot 1
  

Contrary comments 92

• rycamp 48
  
• jumbler 18
  
• parsifal 16
  
• john 6
  
• pinkpunk 2
  
• bangle1 2
  

What context/insight are you making? What is your point of measurement that determines I am not supportive? I clearly stated that trans people should be treated with dignity and respect, while balancing the rights of cisgendered women. In my other comment I pointed out that it isn't for a bunch of blokes on here to be dictating/deciding/mansplaining women's rights.

I guess anyone who doesn't agree with you implicitly, or was mistaken in to believing it was a discussion, is 'contrary'.

High horse comes to mind.

[Parsifal]

He once had the arrogance to say to me:

And I'm not going to get into you bringing up your deity or that silly document.

Talk about silly documents.

[ladsnet]

Enough